Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Furious Bits - February 2008

Is money losing its control over us

February 28th 2008 02:42
For many years now I have harboured a desire not to allow money to control my life. Its grubby little paws are everywhere I go, in everything I do and dictates a fair amount of what lies ahead. Of course you can do things that don’t cost money, the beach is amazing for its naked beauty and emotional impact, but the reality is getting there costs money, living there costs money and eating there costs money.

An older brother told me once to remember money is just a facility to make things happen, it should be used accordingly. Decoding this as pre-teen took a few years but he was spot on and that describes life right now.


But that’s not the question, today people spend big on anything and everything, cars, houses, TVs you name it, its on the list. If we look beyond the social need to be a leader and the emotional support shopping provides, do we see a general lack of respect for money these days?

Do we see the idea that people have no intention of paying back the money, living large whilst they can because they know the worst that can happen is they’ll be made bankrupt. How bad is that, you see all the entrepreneurs do it, superstars and very important people all seem to come out smelling of roses and lets face it if that happens you don’t have to pay it back anyway.

Business seems to be happy to keep collecting the money from people, after all increases in company profits help justify the risks of loss. Its deeper than that of course, if these companies do fail who gets trampled, who is business anyway, the big companies are owned by the public whether through their super funds or personally and so its these people that lose out. If you not spending and living the high life whilst you can, you must be helplessly waiting to be trampled.


that’s just one of my problems with Karma but that’s another story !

Throw in the blunt instrument of interest rate rises the government likes to use to keep us in check and you start to wonder whether money is something that you need in you life. Have we taught our kids too well, the scales of risk seem to favor the live for now whatever the cost lifestyle and those of us who don’t want that will be the ones that end up paying.
48
Vote
Shared on
   


Oiling the shotguns

February 28th 2008 02:05
The problem with engineers is that they can’t accept anything but a complete answer.

Engineers know perfection is just an impossible dream because the methodology and technical aspects behind an end product designed in compromise. Compromise is not a problem where it is necessary for the end product to work, there is no point having a perfect product that no one likes the look of as many many many carmakers will attest.

Sometimes this burden becomes hard to deal with when it seeps its wicked tentacles away from the job and into the real world.

One of the principles of management that evolved through the 80s and 90s was the concept of ‘just in time’, simply put this was the theory of maximizing production efficiency to a point where a minimum stock inventory was required. This is now a standardized feature of manufacturing plants around the world.

If you delve into the theory a little one of the basic ideas that come out of it translates into real life with a well known saying used by just about everyone over the age of 60 – ‘they don’t make things the way the used to, nothing lasts forever’

The easiest example is a Television, it wouldn’t be uncommon for a colour set made in the 70s to last well into the 80s if not the nineties. The components were robust, handled moving house and the rough and tumble of modern living. A modern set however is almost guaranteed to fail a couple of days after the 5 year warranty expires.

The theory behind this is the set life expectancy is 5 years, real life technology and style factors that dictate the majority of purchasers spending patterns set this not the manufacturers, and therefore the set is designed accordingly. There simply is no need to spend more (and add to the purchase price) on robust components that will be discarded before they fail.

Okay so hopefully we got the idea, a shotgun approach may well achieve the end result but it is uneconomical, wasteful and costs the consumers more.

So to Public Transport, this particular boat is floated as a way of reducing the impact on the environment of our transport hungry working population. When looking at the figures there is many good reasons to spruke its benefits especially to those that only require a point to point trip that is serviced by a transport solution.

However that’s the current view based on the vehicles of today, the engineer inside recognises a shotgun from twenty paces and this clearly will be one in the future. In order for a system to be a viable solution to a user, there must be reasonable access to services. Buses, trains and ferries must run to a timetable regardless of passenger numbers to meet this access. The same vehicles i.e. seats must be used regardless of numbers and the service must complete a full route even if passengers are present for small sections.

These factors are the nature of the beast, the compromise that has to be designed in. In terms of the environment even with this huge wastage, public transport can claim to be greener in today’s world, just.

(I don’t know for sure if the overall cost per kilometre is calculated using the full system cost or just the value of one passenger using one and that services impact, statistics can be used in this fashion to show any result you like.)

However if the car became totally eco-friendly, the ability to only use it for a very specific journey would make it very difficult to beat as the most efficient method of transport. Combine that with a technological revolution of what constitutes a road system (keep in mind a Sealed Road was first devised 100 years ago)
And public transport starts to look very expensive and very wasteful.

This idea came to me on a train trip, I dropped my car at the service station for the day it took me 20 minutes to drive there and 60 minutes to get a train back. The train contained 8 carriages each with an estimated 150 seats each, of which 50 % were unused. A fair number of people stood because they didn’t want to sit next to a stranger and a large number of people only stayed on the train for a small number of stops. Next time your children ask for your opinion of a career as an engineer be warned, these are the sorts of things life does to us!
52
Vote
Shared on
   


More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
142 Posts dating from October 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Al Brunswick's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Al Brunswick
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]